Eli Steffen

Creative Consultant, Writer, Performer

  • About
    • Artist Statement
    • Bio
    • CV
    • Contact
      • Mailing List
  • Projects
    • Ephemeral Archives
    • Grieving Fire
    • WAR Belly
    • Propaganda for the Self
    • Strategies for Queer Being and Utopian Art Making in our Dystopic Present
      • References for Strategies for Queer Being and Utopian Art Making in our Dystopic Present
  • Contact

Circles in Reverse: My Families Experiences of Multi-Generational Healing Work

June 3, 2013 by Eli Steffen

Trigger Warning: In this piece I will be discussing experiences of sexual and physical violence.  Please be warned and take care of yourself.

         A couple of months ago I had two experiences in quick succession, which led me to appreciate the generational healing my family has practice for at least half a century.  Generational healing I would define as physical, emotional, and spiritual practice with the goal of leaving the next generation better equipped to address the hardships of living within capitalism than current or previous generations.  It is when we take anger management classes in order to yell at our kids less; it is when we address our histories of abuse cause we know violence is a cycle we want to stop; it is when we go to therapy to learn about feelings we were always taught to keep berried so we can teach our youth to honor their emotions.  Most, if not all, healing work has implications for the generations to come.  My purpose is not to distinguish between different kinds of healing, but instead to look at the ways that the work I have been able to do has built upon and been made possible by the therapeutic practices my parents engaged in. 

         This is not to say they were perfect parents or completely interrupted the cycles of violence they were raised in.  I can still remember the storms of rage (as I like to call them) my father would fly into, often times for completely ridiculous things (I was once thrown out of our car in winter for farting).   One of my brothers and I were subjected to similar cycles of sexual violence my parents spent so much of their lives working to undue. 

         Sometime around 1988-89, my brother (age 6-7) and I (age 4-5) followed an older boy (age 13-14) from our mosque to a near by park where he molested us.  Some days later I told my older brother about the incident, a clever end-around the older boy’s threats that if we told “our parents” he would beat us up.  What ensued was the hot-mess of sexual violence within tight-knit religious communities.  The older boy was believed to be lacking in “responsibility” and was put in charge of all the other children during our weekly prayers that my brother and I continued to attend.  This was the situation until my family finally moved across the country some two or three years later. (The dates are confused because I do not have direct memory of this incident and the stories I’ve been told vary in timeline.)   

         While watching the Perks of Being a Wallflower, a couple of months ago with a date I was triggered back into the emotional-physical distress of this experience.  Towards the end of the movie, the main character, Charlie (an emotionally troubled high school freshman misfit), is making out with his good friend and secret love, Sam.  During this first-kiss experience for Charlie, Sam rubs his inner thigh triggering memories of molestation that Charlie had not remembered until that moment.  In the ensuing breakdown and recovery we learn that Charlie’s deceased and beloved aunt, molested him as a young boy.

         As a survivor of childhood sexual violence, watching this was a deeply triggering experience for me.  I felt my stomach clench, my consciousness felt pulled up out of my body, and my eyes began to water as my muscles tightened.  I felt like I not only knew what Charlie was feeling, but living it with him.  As someone who does not remember my molestation, I am often triggered by physically intimate moments without forewarning and usually have trouble “turning off the thoughts” (an expression of Charlie’s.)  

         Getting triggered is never fun, being triggered on a date with a new romantic interest is really quite distressing.  However, because of the multi-generational healing work my family and I have done I was able to recognize these feelings for what they were (a trigger response), practice self-grounding exercises, and seek supportive physical contact from my date.  These allowed me to continue the date in an engaged and emotionally present state instead of burying my emotions and pretending to feel something I did not.   

         This is not to say that the triggered state disappeared, in fact the next morning I woke up definitely in emotional distress.  In response I continued to practice healthy behavior made possible by generational healing.  I called my mom, who was able to engage in emotionally comforting dialogue about her child (me) while being reminded of my molest as a child and the harmful affects that has had on my life.  This is not an easy thing to do for a mother, especially at eight in the morning.  However, because of the psychological work she has done she was able to provide this supportive and healing function for me. 

         After our conversation I did some journaling about feeling deep emotional pain and how frustrating it is to be so easily “nocked off’ my game.  Journaling about our emotions and our lives has been in my family at least since my father’s 20’s.  When I was 9 years old, my mother helped me start my first journal, writing down my dreams and discussing their meanings with me.   

         Finally I had a cathartic cry, allowing myself to externalize and acknowledge deeply felt feelings of pain and distress.  Although none of this “cured” me of my emotions, nor does it mean I will not be triggered by similar events in the future, they did allow me to get on with my life in an emotionally “healthy” state. 

         Emotions were made important and worthy of consideration through the hard work of my parents who have been going to therapy and/or engaged in spiritual practice since the 1960’s.  This is not trivial nor is it work that is generally accepted and promoted in mainstream society/culture.  In fact, due to its challenges of traditional power structures and cycles of violence (misogyny, male [domestic] violence, substance abuse to name a few) these are practices that are often much maligned and stigmatized.  Only in the last 10-20 years has going to therapy become a relatively socially acceptable practice (it is still often a sign of “something wrong with you,” evoking shame.)  My ability to even admit my feelings much less have the emotional maturity to dialogue with myself enough to transition from a place of distress to catharsis is a direct result of my parents’ self-healing efforts.

 

The second event took place a few weeks later.  That morning I was on my way to a strategic-planning meeting for the organization I was working for, when a man approached me to borrow my cell-phone to make a call.  I gave him my phone which he did use to make a call and then a short-time later he began to walk away.  I followed him, asking for my phone back, at which point the man attempted to run away.  After a brief chase, in which it became clear he was not going to out run me, he turned around to confront me, asking me, “what are you going to do about it,” clearly challenging me to fight him. My masculine socialization screamed for me to do just that.  However, having just heard of a friend who was stabbed and nearly died after fighting with a mugger (over a phone), I made the choice not to. 

         Clearly masculinity was not the only dynamic at play and my decision reflects a high degree of class privilege I have (I knew I could afford another phone).  However, I do not believe that my father could have made a similar choice at my age or at the very least it would have been considerably harder and fraught with much more self-shaming than it was for me.  For my father, it would have been very difficult for him not to see this as a challenge to his sense of self as a man socialized to protect himself and his loved ones with violence.  I, on the other hand, was able to see this as a self-affirming experience that, although traumatic and charged with self-shaming (for I too was socialized male), was a sign of my families efforts to undue the cycles of violence inherent in US mainstream definitions of manhood.

            Through acknowledging and addressing traumatic and trigger events I experience not only the healing work I have done, but the work my parents and past generations in my family have done.  I was able to resist the normative responses called for by male socialization, find support from loved ones, and deal with my emotions so as to be able to continue to live my life without the need to suppress or self-medicate.  These represent powerful changes in how people in my family define “healthy” living and I am grateful to my parents for making it possible.

POETS

May 31, 2013 by Eli Steffen

andrewgibby:

someday we will dare

to write the poems

that will make the world question

whether or not

we are good people.

someday we will dare

to trade good for true.

May 31, 2013 by Eli Steffen





7knotwind:

Alud (Landslip)
Performance, 2011 (video here)

Regina José Galindo 

the artist’s words:
Water runs.

The body is there, dirty.
The public’s position as observer is replaced by the action of participating and cleansing the body. Motivated, perhaps by some empathy for the unknown individual, hidden behind the mud.

DYNAMO project-space, Thessaloniki, Greece
Performance Festival of the 3rd Thessaloniki Biennial of Contemporary Art. Photos by Eleftheria Kalpenidou / courtesy of the Greek State Museum of Contemporary Art. 

This reminds me of cleaning my father’s body after his death.  Super intense and yet grimy…. really cool.

https://www.elisteffen.com/2013/05/31/7knotwind-alud-landslip-performance-2011/

A Search for the Double-Helix of Identity

May 28, 2013 by Eli Steffen

Note: I want to acknowledge all the feminist, POC, and queer thinkers and actors on whose shoulders I work.  Some of these folks I am aware of and have read and many I have not but still feel their influence.  It is fun to think through this for myself and to share it, I imagine others have thought through similar ideas.  I welcome thoughts, comments, or suggestions of resources for further exploration of this topic.

As a queer, anti-oppressive, person studying how culture works, I spend a lot of my time and energy thinking about and seeing the world through identity.  How, I wonder, does this weird thing called identity work?  Are there unifying concepts that can help us understand why people choose identities, how they work, and how they are useful in our lives?  Is there a basic DNA to all identities and if so what is it? 

            First off, lets briefly define identity.  Identity is basically shorthand for a unifying commonality that not everyone has. When two people share an identity they are in effect saying, “Hey, we share X and that is different from those other people and as such we should stick together (in some way.)”  There is obviously more to identity, namely what this unification ends up looking like, but for now I want to focus on the X. 

Is there a way to understand the various kinds of things that people in an identity share?  Are there useful categories of sharing on which identities build themselves?  In what areas do humans find unifying commonality? 

I would propose four basic ways that identities find unity (note many identities use several at the same time.)  These are ancestral history, lived experience, personal desire, and common belief. 

            By ancestral history, I mean to point out that many identities base their membership (unity) on a set of common experiences their ancestors had before they were born.  For example, a key part of white identity in the US is that of immigration and colonization.  Although our families had different interactions with these historic forces, all white people (in the US) share a history of moving here from somewhere else and in imposing European values on an inhabited land.

Another important aspect of ancestral history is holding shared narratives about what happened before the current generation and how that impacts folks living today.  For example, a key part of white identity is our history of “discovering” and “civilizing” the world.  Although this has resulted in a diverse white population, white folks all share a common narrative about white exploration and taming of “savage” lands and peoples. 

            The second block of our identity DNA is lived experience, by which I refer to events that happened to people sharing the identity (as apposed to their ancestors.)  Lesbians and gays come in all shapes and sizes and yet everyone “comes out.”  Even folks who never “really had to come out” must address this common experience as part of their identity.  To be lesbian or gay is to have to actively define your sexuality as not straight and the first time you do that is your “coming out.” 

            Sometimes we build identity based on a shared set of desires.  Gay men want to have sex with men.  To be a gay man, most folks would argue, you must desire sex with other men.

Here we can see that identities often fit into multiple categories.  Gayness is both an identity of lived experience and common desire.  To be gay, it is generally held that you must have lived a series of events (including “coming out”) and hold a particular desire (having sex with people of your gender). 

Finally, there is belief.  Political organizations are a perfect example of this.  Being a socialist does not require any particular history, but instead requires you to adhere to a particular set of beliefs. 

It is definitely true that different people are often contesting the defining attributes of any identity and this creates a rang of who holds a given identity.  However, it is also true that for identity to be useful as shorthand for a unifying commonality, there must be some shared ancestral history, lived experience, personal desire, or common belief.  Without these there is no sharing on which to build the resulting manifestations of unity (ie. community, shared culture, specific spaces, etc)   

 

All this makes me wonder where queerness lies.  Is it an identity of experience, desire or one of belief?  Is queerness based on not being straight and cis-gendered and all the particular encounters with homophobia, trans phobia, and sexism that entails?  Is it an understanding of shared desires and, if so, what are they? Are beliefs the underpinning of a queer identity?  Do we share a similar understanding about how the world is and how people should act within it? Or is it some weird hybrid? 

And where does choice come to play in all of this?  How much agency do we as individuals or as community hold over the unifying attributes of our identities?  Are we stuck with what is or can we decide to make our identities into something new?

 

Not sure the answers but excited to keep looking.  I would love to hear any thoughts you have.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

About Me

I am a speculative artist working in the fields of performance, visual art, and curation.

Connect with me

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Latest Tweets

  • Just now
  • Follow me

Copyright © 2026 · Beautiful Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in